xnxvideos momIndian auntyIndian sex videos web xxn anyxvideos videos and xvideos www xxx TamilTelugu Www xxx hindi xnxx-br.com XxxXxx hot sexy bf chat

Facebook Live Killings

Read the article “Cleveland Shooting Highlights Facebook’s Responsibility in Policing Depraved Videos” located at http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/cleveland-shooting-highlights-facebook-s-responsibility-policing-depraved-videos-n747306.

Write a 4–5-page paper in which you do the following:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Facebook Live Killings
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Discuss whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.
Suggest and elaborate on three ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.
Propose two safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.
Conduct some research to determine whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, discuss the key functions of these positions. If not, debate on whether or not it should create these roles.
Propose two changes Facebook should adopt to encourage the ethical use of its platform.
Use the (Strayer University Library) to locate two quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference, and proprietary websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with 1-inch margins on all sides; citations and follow the Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is as follows:

Analyze the legal standing and situation of a specific business to achieve a defined result.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric:

NAME: LEG500 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT 1: FACEBOOK LIVE KILLINGS
DESCRIPTION: LEG500 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT 1: FACEBOOK LIVE KILLINGS
Grid View
List View
Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A LEG500-A1-1
1. Discuss whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 29.38 (10.49%)

Did not submit or incompletely discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

Points Range: 29.4 (10.5%) – 33.58 (11.99%)

Partially discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

Points Range: 33.6 (12%) – 37.78 (13.49%)

Satisfactorily discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

Points Range: 37.8 (13.5%) – 42 (15%)

Thoroughly discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

LEG500-A1-2
2. Suggest and elaborate on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 39.17 (13.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

Points Range: 39.2 (14%) – 44.77 (15.99%)

Partially suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

Points Range: 44.8 (16%) – 50.37 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

Points Range: 50.4 (18%) – 56 (20%)

Thoroughly suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

LEG500-A1-3
3. Propose two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 39.17 (13.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

Points Range: 39.2 (14%) – 44.77 (15.99%)

Partially proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

Points Range: 44.8 (16%) – 50.37 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

Points Range: 50.4 (18%) – 56 (20%)

Thoroughly proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

LEG500-A1-4
4. Conduct some research to determine whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, discuss the key functions of these positions. If not, debate on whether or not they should create these roles.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 29.38 (10.49%)

Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they did not submit or incompletely discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they did not submit or incompletely debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

Points Range: 29.4 (10.5%) – 33.58 (11.99%)

Partially determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they partially discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they partially debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

Points Range: 33.6 (12%) – 37.78 (13.49%)

Satisfactorily determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they satisfactorily discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they satisfactorily debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

Points Range: 37.8 (13.5%) – 42 (15%)

Thoroughly determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they thoroughly discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they thoroughly debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

LEG500-A1-5
5. Propose two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 29.38 (10.49%)

Did not submit or incompletely proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

Points Range: 29.4 (10.5%) – 33.58 (11.99%)

Partially proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

Points Range: 33.6 (12%) – 37.78 (13.49%)

Satisfactorily proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

Points Range: 37.8 (13.5%) – 42 (15%)

Thoroughly proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

LEG500-A1-6
6. 2 references
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 9.79 (3.5%)

No references provided

Points Range: 9.8 (3.5%) – 11.19 (4%)

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Points Range: 11.2 (4%) – 12.59 (4.5%)

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Points Range: 12.6 (4.5%) – 14 (5%)

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

LEG500-A1-7
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 19.59 (7%)

More than 6 errors present

Points Range: 19.6 (7%) – 22.39 (7.99%)

5-6 errors present

Points Range: 22.4 (8%) – 25.19 (9%)

3-4 errors present

Points Range: 25.2 (9%) – 28 (10%)

0-2 errors present

Chegg Answers
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with CheggAnswers

Quality Essays

At CheggAnswers.com, we boast of our quick turnaround that is facilitated by our experienced team of writers. We can handle both short and long deadlines, as per our clients’ requests. Quality work is the cornerstone of our service.

Top Writers

Our writers are qualified professionals who are well-versed with more than 80 subjects. We have achieved this milestone overtime because of our rigorous hiring process that filters professionals from average writers. We believe that exposing our customers to qualified writers is the starting point of delivering quality work.

Plagiarism-Free Papers

Our writers submit papers that are written from scratch to uphold the much-needed originality when submitting your papers. Our references are mainly sourced from reputable databases such as Emerald Insight, Ebsco, and ProQuest. All papers follow the conventional styles of referencing that include APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and Vancouver.

24/7 Customer Support

The customer is king and as such, CheggAnswers.com has a committed support department that handles all concerns and clarifications from our clients. We encourage customers to contact us at any given time through our listed telephone, email, and text platforms.

Prompt Delivery & 100% Money Back Guarantee

Your work starts immediately after placing an order. Our writers are aware of our company policy that guarantees quality work to all our customers. For this reason, CheggAnswers strives to deliver assignments on time to avoid any delays that might compromise our relationship with clients.

Free Revisions

Although we are confident in our writers, you are entitled to free revisions whenever need arises. However, we highly disregard customers who misuse this privilege.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

We offer a wide range of services that are aligned with the customers’ needs and expectations. We have positioned ourselves strategically to become a one-stop-shop where customers can access all academic services under one roof.

Essays

Academic Writing

Our main service is academic paper writing, which is handled by a pool of experienced writers who uphold the expected standards of writing. Over the years, we have delivered quality work to our clients because of our commitment to promote quality over quantity.

Admissions

Admission Essays

Whether you are about to Join College or you are a continuing student, CheggAnswers is there to help. Our competent professionals will solve all your writing problems. Personalization is key to scoring highly and satisfying the admission board’s expectations. We will help you achieve your academic goals.

Reviews

Editing & Proofreading

Some of our clients prefer to write their essays and have a third-party like CheggAnswers proofread their work. We have a skilled team of editors who comb through your paper and make any amends to increase its overall appeal. For all your editing and proofreading needs, CheggAnswers is there to help.

Reviews

Revision Support

At CheggAnswers, we offer an extensive revision support that works tirelessly to ensure that customer needs and expectations are met. We work closely with writers upon a customer’s revision request to ensure that we keep our promise of delivering quality work to all our clients.