PICOT Statement related to Patient Control Analgesia For Pain Management

(My Topic I assignment is “PICOT Statement related to Patient Control Analgesia For Pain Management” has already been submitted to my tutor).

Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Consideration based on PICOT Statement patient Controlled Analgesia is required to be submitted on 2/3/2018 i.e. Question No. I below.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
PICOT Statement related to Patient Control Analgesia For Pain Management
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Question No. II – Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations based on PICOT Statement patient Controlled Analgesia is required to be submitted on 2/6/2018.

Question No III – Benchmark – Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft is required to be submitted on 2/8/2018)

Question No. I

Max Points: 200

Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

Use the practice problem and a qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1000-1,250 word essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Refer to the resource “Research Critique Guidelines” for suggested headings and content for your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

NRS-433V-RS-Research-Critique-Guidelines.docx

Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%

3
Satisfactory
83.00%

4
Good
94.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

75.0 %Content

15.0 %Background of Study

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

15.0 %Method of Study

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

15.0 %Results of Study

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

15.0 %Ethical Considerations

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

15.0 %Conclusion

Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.

Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing.

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the findings importance to nursing practice.

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

5.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

Question No. II

Max Points: 200

Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

Use the practice problem and a quantitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1000-1,250 word essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Refer to the resource “Research Critique Guidelines” for suggested headings and content for your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%

3
Satisfactory
83.00%

4
Good
94.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

75.0 %Content

15.0 %Background of Study

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

15.0 %Method of Study

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

15.0 %Results of Study

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

15.0 %Ethical Considerations

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

15.0 %Conclusion

Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.

Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing.

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the findings importance to nursing practice.

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

5.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

Question No. III

Max Points: 300

Benchmark – Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft

Details:

Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the Topic 1, 2, and 3 assignments and the guidelines below.

PICOT Statement

Revise the PICOT statement you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment.

The final PICOT statement will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

Research Critiques

In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique. Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of the study by making appropriate revisions.

The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT statement.

Refer to “Research Critique Guidelines.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

Discuss the link between the PICOT statement, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

NRS-433V-RS-Research-Critique-Guidelines.docx

Benchmark – Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%

3
Satisfactory
83.00%

4
Good
94.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

60.0 %Content

5.0 %Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Statement

A nursing practice problem is not clearly described and/or a PICOT statement is not included.

PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.

PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.

PICOT statement articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.

PICOT statement clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.

5.0 %Background of Study

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

5.0 %Method of Study

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

5.0 %Results of Study

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

5.0 %Ethical Considerations

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

5.0 %Conclusion

Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.

Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing.

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the findings importance to nursing practice.

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.

10.0 %Evidence of Revision

Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques.

Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete.

Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present.

Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided.

Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.

10.0 %PICOT Statement, Research Article, and Nursing Practice Problem Link (C. 2.2)

Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is not included.

Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or incorrect.

Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation.

Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.

Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting explanation.

10.0 %Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change (C. 3.2)

The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included.

The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect.

Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation. The proposed evidence-based practice change is included but lacks supporting explanation and relevant details.

The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete and includes supporting explanation and relevant details.

The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and numerous relevant details.

30.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

10.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

10.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

17 hours ago
ATTACHMENTS
nrs_433v_rs_research_critique_guidelines__1_.docx

Please go through all 3 questions, rubrics, and attachments – (Qualitative study and Quantitative study). My PICOT statement related to Patient Controlled Analgesia for Pain Management already submitted to my tutor. So the answers need to be based on Patient Controlled Analgesia for Pain Management.

Attachments area

20180202031010nrs_433v_rs_research_critique_guidelines__1_

Chegg Answers
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with CheggAnswers

Quality Essays

At CheggAnswers.com, we boast of our quick turnaround that is facilitated by our experienced team of writers. We can handle both short and long deadlines, as per our clients’ requests. Quality work is the cornerstone of our service.

Top Writers

Our writers are qualified professionals who are well-versed with more than 80 subjects. We have achieved this milestone overtime because of our rigorous hiring process that filters professionals from average writers. We believe that exposing our customers to qualified writers is the starting point of delivering quality work.

Plagiarism-Free Papers

Our writers submit papers that are written from scratch to uphold the much-needed originality when submitting your papers. Our references are mainly sourced from reputable databases such as Emerald Insight, Ebsco, and ProQuest. All papers follow the conventional styles of referencing that include APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and Vancouver.

24/7 Customer Support

The customer is king and as such, CheggAnswers.com has a committed support department that handles all concerns and clarifications from our clients. We encourage customers to contact us at any given time through our listed telephone, email, and text platforms.

Prompt Delivery & 100% Money Back Guarantee

Your work starts immediately after placing an order. Our writers are aware of our company policy that guarantees quality work to all our customers. For this reason, CheggAnswers strives to deliver assignments on time to avoid any delays that might compromise our relationship with clients.

Free Revisions

Although we are confident in our writers, you are entitled to free revisions whenever need arises. However, we highly disregard customers who misuse this privilege.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

We offer a wide range of services that are aligned with the customers’ needs and expectations. We have positioned ourselves strategically to become a one-stop-shop where customers can access all academic services under one roof.

Essays

Academic Writing

Our main service is academic paper writing, which is handled by a pool of experienced writers who uphold the expected standards of writing. Over the years, we have delivered quality work to our clients because of our commitment to promote quality over quantity.

Admissions

Admission Essays

Whether you are about to Join College or you are a continuing student, CheggAnswers is there to help. Our competent professionals will solve all your writing problems. Personalization is key to scoring highly and satisfying the admission board’s expectations. We will help you achieve your academic goals.

Reviews

Editing & Proofreading

Some of our clients prefer to write their essays and have a third-party like CheggAnswers proofread their work. We have a skilled team of editors who comb through your paper and make any amends to increase its overall appeal. For all your editing and proofreading needs, CheggAnswers is there to help.

Reviews

Revision Support

At CheggAnswers, we offer an extensive revision support that works tirelessly to ensure that customer needs and expectations are met. We work closely with writers upon a customer’s revision request to ensure that we keep our promise of delivering quality work to all our clients.