• Paper summary
• Top 3 contributions of the paper
• Most glaring problem(s) with the work (up to 3)
So there must be three main sections:
Summary: In this section, I expect to see a brief description of the paper (problem, motivation, approach, evaluation findings).
Contributions: What are in your opinion the three main contributions of this work?
Limitations: What do you think are the weaker points in the paper? e.g., assumptions do not always hold, evaluation is not correct, failure scenarios have not been discussed.