xnxvideos momIndian auntyIndian sex videos web xxn anyxvideos videos and xvideos www xxx TamilTelugu Www xxx hindi xnxx-br.com XxxXxx hot sexy bf chat

Two Arbitration Rulings, Reflecting How Baseball Has Changed

2)When considering the content in the article, Two Arbitration Rulings, Reflecting How Baseball Has Changed, it is obvious that collective bargaining agreements influence MLB professional athletes and franchise owners.

Based on the readings in the article, what is the major disagreements or issues related to the two arbitration rulings? Also, what is the role of Major League Baseball and the MLB Player Union in these situations? How do you suggest that these issues should have been resolved?

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Two Arbitration Rulings, Reflecting How Baseball Has Changed
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Two Arbitration Rulings, Reflecting How Baseball Has Changed: [News Analysis]
Murray Chass.New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.[New York, N.Y]15 Jan 2014: B.12.

Publisher logo. Links to publisher website, opened in a new window.

Full text

In his written ruling on Alex Rodriguez’s appeal of his 211-game suspension, baseball’s impartial arbitrator raises the name and pathetic case of Steve Howe, the pitcher who was given more chances to play baseball than Billy Martin was given to manage the Yankees. Last year, the commissioner’s office said, 119 players were granted therapeutic-use exemptions to use medication, which otherwise is banned, for attention deficit disorder.

Full Text
TranslateFull text

In his written ruling on Alex Rodriguez’s appeal of his 211-game suspension, baseball’s impartial arbitrator raises the name and pathetic case of Steve Howe, the pitcher who was given more chances to play baseball than Billy Martin was given to manage the Yankees.

The arbitrator, Fredric R. Horowitz, cited Howe’s seventh suspension — his 1992 lifetime ban, which another arbitrator reduced to 119 days — as a guideline for the season-long suspension he levied on Rodriguez. Horowitz, however, neglected to note the most intriguing aspect of the arbitrator George Nicolau’s reduction of Howe’s lifetime ban.

Nicolau, Horowitz wrote, found that “a lifetime ban was not supported by just cause” and that the 119 games he missed after his suspension on June 8, 1992, were sufficient.

Horowitz mentioned “various mitigating factors,” which very likely included the one that was the highlight of Nicolau’s ruling.

Richard Moss, who argued Howe’s appeal, came up with a defense based on “adult attention deficit disorder,” which had never been presented in a grievance hearing.

Moss, the union’s general counsel under Marvin Miller, was Howe’s agent, and he handled the appeal, he said Tuesday, because the union lawyers were reluctant to do it because of their relationship with Commissioner Fay Vincent, who had thrown Howe, a chronic cocaine and alcohol abuser, out of baseball.

Coincidentally, 21 years later, and eight years after Howe’s death, nonunion lawyers handled Rodriguez’s appeal because the Yankees’ star slugger was angry with the union and didn’t want its lawyers representing him.

Rodriguez has since included the union as a target in his lawsuit against Major League Baseball, in which he seeks to have a federal judge throw out the arbitrator’s decision. Given federal judges’ overwhelming record for letting arbitrators’ rulings stand, it is highly unlikely that Rodriguez’s lawyers, Joseph Tacopina and Jordan Siev, will fare any better in court than they did in the grievance hearing.

Major League Baseball learned about the futility of challenging an arbitrator’s decision in the Messersmith-McNally case in 1975-76.

When Peter Seitz, the arbitrator, was about to rule in that free-agency case, he called in Miller and John Gaherin, the owners’ negotiator, hinted where he was headed and urged them to negotiate a settlement. Gaherin forwarded that advice to the owners, but he was overruled by Commissioner Bowie Kuhn and Lou Hoynes, the clubs’ chief lawyer.

Let him rule against us, they said. If he does, we’ll go to court and win there.

Seitz did rule against the owners, granting free agency to pitchers Andy Messersmith and Dave McNally. The owners did go to court, and they lost. They have been paying for it ever since.

“It wasn’t based on precedent,” Vincent, himself a lawyer, said Tuesday. “It was based on a reading of a contract. It was bad lawyering.”

Vincent, on the other hand, wasn’t pleased with the lawyering that eased Howe back into baseball. The pitcher had been suspended a sixth time but wouldn’t give up.

“When Steve Howe came to me and asked to be permitted to play in the minors, he and his wife swore they had a new life,” Vincent said in a telephone interview. “They had become Christians and would live the right way. I let Howe go to the minors, and the Yankees brought him up.”

Vincent barred Howe for life in June 1992 after he pleaded guilty to attempting to buy cocaine in Montana the previous off-season.

“We agreed he would be tested regularly without notice to make sure he wasn’t using cocaine,” Moss said. “It worked for a while, but he got busted in the off-season. They stopped testing him in the off-season, and testing was a very important part of keeping him straight. That was a failure by the commissioner’s office.”

Nicolau agreed with Moss on that point, and he also agreed that Howe had “an underlying psychiatric disorder” that had never been treated.

Recent studies had found that adult attention deficit disorder, if untreated, could lead to cocaine addiction. Moss made that argument, and the arbitrator found it reasonable enough to overturn Howe’s lifetime ban.

At that time, A.A.D.D. was unheard of in baseball. Last year, the commissioner’s office said, 119 players were granted therapeutic-use exemptions to use medication, which otherwise is banned, for attention deficit disorder.

Vincent recalled that George Steinbrenner, the Yankees’ owner, did not object to his barring Howe.

“When I called him and told him what I was doing, he said, ‘You won’t have any problem from me.’ But I had problems with Michael and Showalter.”

General Manager Gene Michael and Manager Buck Showalter got themselves into trouble at the hearing Vincent held before suspending Howe for the seventh time.

Michael argued that baseball’s drug policy was bad, and Vincent strongly reminded him that as a club executive he was obliged to support the policy, not fight it. No club executive in his right mind would criticize baseball’s drug policy today.

As for the Rodriguez suspension, people have wondered how Commissioner Bud Selig arrived at his 211-game penalty. The arbitrator’s written decision includes Selig’s letter notifying Rodriguez of his suspension. It notes that the suspension was to begin Aug. 8, meaning the third baseman would miss the last 49 games of the season. Forty-nine games of the 2013 season plus all 162 games of the 2014 season equal 211.

In his opinion, Horowitz notes that no major league player has been suspended “for any substance abuse violation longer than one season,” adding, “The suspension imposed by M.L.B. for Rodriguez in August 2013 did not extend beyond the 2014 season.”

And that is why Horowitz stuck to 2014.

MURRAY CHASS Murray Chass, a retired baseball reporter and columnist for The New York Times, continues to write baseball columns at murraychass.com.


Steve Howe, Left, Was Given a Lifetime Ban, Which Was Later Reduced, in 1992 After He Pleaded Guilty to a Drug Charge. (Photograph by Barry Sweet/ Associated Press)

Word count: 1020

Copyright New York Times Company Jan 15, 2014

Barra, Allen.Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y. [New York, N.Y]08 Apr 2009: D.7.
Platt, Donna M; Rowlett, James K; Spealman, Roger D.Psychopharmacology; Heidelberg Vol. 163, Iss. 3-4, (Oct 2002): 265-82.
All Things Considered; Washington, D.C. : 1. Washington, D.C.: NPR. (Sep 5, 2003)
Weiss, Roger D; Griffin, Margaret L; Mazurick, Carissa; Berkmann, Benjamin; et al.The American Journal of Psychiatry; Washington Vol. 160, Iss. 7, (Jul 2003): 1320-5.
Rust, Art, Jr.Black Issues Book Review; Fairfax Vol. 5, Iss. 5, (Sep/Oct 2003): 64.
Show more related items

Back to top
Contact Us
Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
Cookie Preferences

Chegg Answers
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with CheggAnswers

Quality Essays

At CheggAnswers.com, we boast of our quick turnaround that is facilitated by our experienced team of writers. We can handle both short and long deadlines, as per our clients’ requests. Quality work is the cornerstone of our service.

Top Writers

Our writers are qualified professionals who are well-versed with more than 80 subjects. We have achieved this milestone overtime because of our rigorous hiring process that filters professionals from average writers. We believe that exposing our customers to qualified writers is the starting point of delivering quality work.

Plagiarism-Free Papers

Our writers submit papers that are written from scratch to uphold the much-needed originality when submitting your papers. Our references are mainly sourced from reputable databases such as Emerald Insight, Ebsco, and ProQuest. All papers follow the conventional styles of referencing that include APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and Vancouver.

24/7 Customer Support

The customer is king and as such, CheggAnswers.com has a committed support department that handles all concerns and clarifications from our clients. We encourage customers to contact us at any given time through our listed telephone, email, and text platforms.

Prompt Delivery & 100% Money Back Guarantee

Your work starts immediately after placing an order. Our writers are aware of our company policy that guarantees quality work to all our customers. For this reason, CheggAnswers strives to deliver assignments on time to avoid any delays that might compromise our relationship with clients.

Free Revisions

Although we are confident in our writers, you are entitled to free revisions whenever need arises. However, we highly disregard customers who misuse this privilege.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

We offer a wide range of services that are aligned with the customers’ needs and expectations. We have positioned ourselves strategically to become a one-stop-shop where customers can access all academic services under one roof.


Academic Writing

Our main service is academic paper writing, which is handled by a pool of experienced writers who uphold the expected standards of writing. Over the years, we have delivered quality work to our clients because of our commitment to promote quality over quantity.


Admission Essays

Whether you are about to Join College or you are a continuing student, CheggAnswers is there to help. Our competent professionals will solve all your writing problems. Personalization is key to scoring highly and satisfying the admission board’s expectations. We will help you achieve your academic goals.


Editing & Proofreading

Some of our clients prefer to write their essays and have a third-party like CheggAnswers proofread their work. We have a skilled team of editors who comb through your paper and make any amends to increase its overall appeal. For all your editing and proofreading needs, CheggAnswers is there to help.


Revision Support

At CheggAnswers, we offer an extensive revision support that works tirelessly to ensure that customer needs and expectations are met. We work closely with writers upon a customer’s revision request to ensure that we keep our promise of delivering quality work to all our clients.